Improving Rankings with Google Search Console Search Analytics

Google Search Console.

Yes, it’s time to wipe the dust off your account over at Google Search Console (GSC) and actually use that thing for the SEO you thought you were going to when you first signed up.

Today we’re going to focus on using your Search Analytics within GSC, formerly known as Webmaster Tools in a past life, to find new keywords and to improve existing rankings.

I know this may sound counterintuitive. Why would I go through search terms I already rank for to find new keywords to write about? Because we’re going to be looking for search terms you’re ranking on, but not currently ranking in the top three.

Beyond that, ranking for a term is only half the battle! You need to get clicks from the search results to your actual posts, and being in the top three or the new Position Zero is the most effective way to get those clicks.

These non-top three rankings are going to represent the best “opportunities” for terms we’re going to try to push into the higher spots that matter.

Improving Rankings with Google Search Console Search Analytics

For our first case study, we’re going to use our own site, Food Fanatic.

Please note that the screenshots below are from an older version of Google Search Console. The process remains the same, but the interface may look slightly different. 

Click on Search Analytics under Search TrafficLet’s begin by picking a target keyword we’re going to work on. Step one is firing up Google Search Console, log into our Food Fanatic property, and click on Search Analytics under “Search Traffic” in the left hand nav.

On this page, we’re first going to turn on all available metrics for the page: Clicks, Impressions, CTR (click through rate) and Position. We’re then going to sort in descending order of Impressions to look for our most valuable opportunity.

We’re going to look for the first term we’re in in the top three for. Although the Cinnamon Toast Crunch Shot seems delicious, we’re going to save that one for the next part in this series and today focus on the far less exciting “parboil.”

Parboil is showing 7,034 impressions. That means our ranking on that page has appeared in Google search results over 7000 times, but we’ve only had 87 clicks.

Why? Because we’re only ranked 6.5, and so our CTR is only 1.25%. We can likely get this to over 5 times the amount of traffic if we can push up our rankings.

So how do we do it? By focusing on parboil-related terms to prove to Google we’re not just an expert on “parboil” with our one post, but an expert on all things parboiling.

We’re going to accomplish this by generating additional content related to parboiling, all while continuing to beef up our original post.

Step 1: Where do we find the additional related terms?

There are a few options, but we’re going to focus on two free ones offered by Google themselves: this same Search Analytics tool we’ve been using within Google Search Console, and then the actual Google Search results, using a feature called “People Also Ask.”

Finding Related Keywords within the Search Analytics Tool

While still in the Search Analytics window, we’re going to look within our own results for other parboil related terms. We’re going to click the “No Filter” button under Queries and add in a search for “parboil.” Now we have the following results, again sorted in descending order of impressions:

Parboil Search Analytics Results

Let’s look for the next “related” keyword we’re going to go after. “How to parboil potatoes” is the obvious choice with a ranking of 9.2 and 1,118 impressions. Parboiling carrots, sweet potatoes, and vegetables are all equally great opportunities for here.

Why? Because, like our initial strategy, we’re focusing on terms where we don’t rank in the top 3.

This time around, we’re adding in another rule to keep ourselves sane:

Is the post different enough that we can create new content?

For example, we’re going to ignore “what is parboil” and “what does parboil mean” for now and focus on different things we can parboil for our new content pieces. We can always answer the other parboil questions within our original parboiling article.

Using the “People Also Ask” Box for additional keywords

We’re also going to take advantage of the “People Also Ask” box, a pretty great new feature added by Google for “question” based searches.

I swear I didn’t cheat, but the first term we found in our previous example is a great keyword and an example of a “How” question that will trigger the People Also Ask Box.

These question terms that trigger the People Also Ask Box are important, since Google is showing you some awesome insights under their hood.

They’re showing you what keywords are related to the search term you’re typing into the box. If you click one of the results, you’ll get even more suggestions. This is going to lead us to our secondary strategy we can use for additional terms.

Parboil People Also Ask

This gives us a pretty good list in terms of the number of related posts we can write. If we didn’t have a People Also Ask box, we simply could’ve turned our original query of “parboil” into a question to get other suggestions (typing “What is parboiling?” instead of just “parboiling” into the search box).

In fact, rather than relying on our potato term, let’s show you how to do this with a generic term like “parboil” and turn it into an even better set of results.

After Googling “How to parboil,” the following questions were also asked by people:

  • How do you parboil potatoes?
  • How do you parboil vegetables?
  • How do you parboil rice?
  • How do you parboil broccoli?
  • How do you par cook sweet potatoes?
  • How do you parboil carrots?

We could keep going, but that seems like more than enough additional search terms for now.

Step 2: Okay, we have our related terms. Now what?

We’re going to get writing! We’re going to turn all of those new related keywords we mentioned above into their own blog posts.

Wait… WHAT? That’s too much content!

Sorry, you’re reading a SEO post by an engineer – not a writer. Better get that pot boiling because we’re going to be doing a lot of parboiling. I mean, I assume a pot is involved in parboiling?

Again, engineer. Not a food blogger.

But first, let’s talk about our original post

Before we get into the new content, it’s important to focus on the post that was originally winning our search term and analyze things a bit.

In our case, it’s a pretty great post from 2013 entitled “How To: Parboil.” A little short, but it covers how to parboil any root vegetable. In particular, it seems to use photos of potatoes.

The good news is Google definitely already loves this post for the big term “parboil” and it’s already generic enough to continue to be our post that goes after the big term “parboil.”  

As such, we’re going to make this our generic “gateway” post for the term parboil.

Think about it this way: The “gateway” post will serve as an overall guide to parboiling, including the how, what, and why terms we saw in the related keywords.

As we move on to focus on the different things we can parboil as described above, each one will get its own post that our generic gateway page will link to.

Seeing as this post is a little short, it’s also a good thing we’re adding additional content to the page. If there’s one thing we know Google loves, it’s quality, unique content. That’s exactly what we’re going to add, so it should only continue to help boost our parboiling ranking.

Again, though, that’s only half the battle. Most of this strategy comes in creating the additional related terms that Google suggested for us and showing we’re also experts.

So what are we writing for these six new posts?

To prove to Google we are in fact the premiere experts on all things parboiling – from carrots to rice – it’s now time to focus on creating those six new posts related to parboiling,

Each one will be its own post, likely titled exactly what people are searching for on Google. For example, we’re going to make a post with “How do you parboil broccoli?” as the title.

We’re going to take pictures of ourselves parboiling broccoli and discuss specific times, methods, etc. It doesn’t matter if this is only a little bit different than potatoes.

Put yourself in a non-cook’s hat for a second: If I found this post searching for a “how to parboil broccoli” and you showed me how to parboil carrots, how would I know that’s the same thing? These specific posts are actually great for the user, and at the end of the day, that’s what Google is looking for – great content for its users. 

Step 3: Fine, I’ll write them. But how are these helping me rank for my original term?

The goal of each of these posts is twofold. First, to give ourselves a chance to rank on additional keywords. Second, to help boost our original ranking on “parboil.”

To accomplish the first goal, we simply need to write great content on those new posts. If we do the best job on the Internet of telling people “How do you parboil broccoli,” then Google will recognize and reward our content. They already think we know something about parboiling, so we must be doing something right.

We can also use our original parboil post, where Google has established we are the master of this cooking method, to show we’re also the master of using it on specific food types like broccoli. How? By linking. Link to the new “How do I parboil broccoli?” post from the original “How to parboil” post.

To accomplish our second goal of boosting our ranking on “parboil,” we’ll focus on linking back to the original post on the anchor text “parboil”, “How to parboil,” “parboiling” or any of the other “generic” terms we surfaced from our keyword research.

Additionally – and this is very important – within each of the new posts we create, and, the original “How to parboil” post, we’re going to link around within the whole series too. For example, “how to parboil carrots” will link within the content to “how to parboil broccoli” and “how to parboil potatoes” as we create those pages. We will link on those keywords, and in the actual content, not just in a list at the end of the post. Link, link, link!

These are highly related terms to Google, and therefore likely useful to our readers as well. Linking our related content further signals to Google that we’re an experts on all of these related terms.

We know this article was likely a little involved, and conveniently specific for one term on Food Fanatic. We’re going to be turning these case studies into a monthly series, where we hope we can show you the results and explore more terms on our sites.

Our goal is to get you into the SEO mindset that we’re in whenever we generate content. Once you begin thinking this way and setting up your content strategy around SEO, you’ll find it’s far less challenging than you think.

Search Console Infographic

13 thoughts on “Improving Rankings with Google Search Console Search Analytics”

  1. Eric,
    Thanks for the great advice here! I decided to experiment with one of my posts and I followed EXACTLY what you said to do here. I have seen a dramatic increase in page rank on that post. I was ranking on page 2 of google for my Chori-Pollo recipe and today – after just a couple of weeks – am the first post after position 0 (Is that first or second? I don’t know. lol). So – AMAZING! Thanks!

  2. eileen says:

    Thank you!!! This is exactly the type of information I need. I love the specific step by step instructions.

  3. Erin says:

    Eric, this is a great post, thank you! My question: What do you do if your term doesn’t generate a question (if it’s something vague like “slow cooker recipes” for example?) Would you just click on one of the related terms at the bottom (“slow cooker recipes vegetarian) for example, then pick whichever term is easiest to turn into a blog post? Thanks for the insights!

    1. Eric Hochberger says:

      Those related searches are the bottom are a good source, but so is a deeper dive into your GSC Search Analytics. Try filtering the keywords there with “slow cooker” to see what else you’re ranking for. You may have plenty of related terms in there you don’t yet have dedicated posts and will offer more chances to improve rankings on those terms, and link and over to and boost your rankings for “slow cooker recipes.”

  4. Kamila says:

    Hi Eric, thank you so much for this article. When I did my initial search looking for posts with most impressions. I found that two of my posts are on the first position, they get thousands of impressions, but hardly any traffic. Turns up, it’s only the pictures from the posts. They show next to a post from a completely different website, on position zero, my article doesn’t show in the first 10 results at all. How do I interpret it and how can I change it?

    1. Amber Bracegirdle says:

      Hey Kamila,
      That’s actually purposeful behavior on behalf of Google. Your photos are seen as the best, while the other blog post in position zero as seen as the best content. Take a look at that post in position zero. How is it different from yours? Can you alter your post to have more helpful information like is found in the position zero post? Also, consider writing related content, and making sure that you link to the related content from the post that you want to pull up in ranking, and vice versa. Have a look at our posts on parboiling on Food Fanatic for an example of how to do this.
      – Amber

  5. Thanks for the advice! It is examples like this that really bring it home for me. We have a couple of sites and our travel blog has fairly good DA/PA but not enough sessions to join up with Mediavine yet, though we are well established. I think working on the SEO and updating old posts and following your tips will help keep me focused. The goal, is to sign up with you guys! 🙂

    1. Jenny Guy says:

      Great to hear from you, Heidi!

      We love travel sites at Mediavine. In fact, “Next Level Travel Blogging” is planned for our Summer of Live Facebook Live broadcast in July.

      The real litmus test for us to take on a site is whether our premium advertising partners will bid well on a site. They rely not only on our requested Google Analytics snapshot (via a custom template), but also their own vetting tools. Below a certain traffic threshold, your domain won’t even show up in the tools, no matter how long it has existed.

      We would never want to take on a site unless we were certain that we could earn and earn well for a publisher, especially because in order to join Mediavine, you are required to provide us with exclusivity over your ad inventory. If the majority of our ad partners don’t know enough about your domain from our tools to bid consistently, it would not be the best experience for you.

      This is why we’ve set our traffic threshold at 25k sessions. Now that you’re putting your focus on SEO and growing your traffic, we predict you’ll see rapid growth. You have the content and the domain authority and the fan base, we just need the sessions that our partners value.

      We look forward to seeing your application SOON!

      ~Jenny, Mediavine Marketing Associate

  6. Gina says:

    Hey Eric – my question is about the “gateway post”. What if the post you’re ranking on for a term doesn’t really seem to be a good gateway post? As in – it’s a bit too specific to serve that purpose. I have a situation like this where I think it might be better to create a new post and have THAT be the gateway post and the post that’s currently ranking play more of a supporting role, obviously linking to the gateway and then having the gateway link to it. Does that make sense to do or would doing that screw up what I’m already ranking for?

    1. Amber Bracegirdle says:

      Hey Gina,
      We went through that with our “how to parboil potatoes” on Food Fanatic. It was ranking for “How to Parboil”. And, the truth is, we ran with it. If Google thinks that’s a great post for “How to Parboil”, we’re not going to try and correct them. You could go ahead and build that other post out, and link it around in the same way you would other supporting content, and see if Google starts to like that post better. If they don’t, it’s okay. It’s there, and over time it might start to rank better, as you build out more supporting content and link to it.

      – Amber

  7. Gina says:

    So I went and stalked all those parboil posts…it looks like you took the original post that was ranking and renamed it/changed the url to the more general “how to parboil” making it the gateway post and then created a new post for “how to parboil potatoes” among all those other ones. Is that correct?

    1. Amber Bracegirdle says:

      Hey Gina,
      Actually, no. We started out with this post: – which was always about parboiling potatoes. We’d asked the contributor to parboil anything he wanted, and that’s what he went with. Even though the entire post is about parboiling potatoes, the term we went after was “how to parboil”. We later added a post called “How do you parboil potatoes, but it wasn’t until much later, when we were working on all the different parboiling posts.

Comments are closed.